Framing 115 Years of Geopolitics in 230 Words

Interested in improving your skills in this field? Then contact me about my in-house skills training sessions or apply for this Summer School course at Maastricht University:


GeopoliticsSince the term geopolitics was coined in 1899 it has had many different meanings. They all evolve around its two parts, “geo” and “politics.” Dealing with the possible meanings requires a thorough understanding of what distinguishes them from one another.

First, “geo” can denote various geographic aspects, such as space, soil, or territory. More specifically, it can denote geographic conditions, such as the presence of natural resources in a bounded area. Whether geography should be considered a static or a dynamic factor has also been subject to debate.

Furthermore, “politics” generally concerns factors that are related to power, such as foreign policy, international relations, and military strategy. Here the discussion has been fueled by different views on the relative importance of states vis-à-vis nonstate actors.

Causality and its intensity is another cause of disagreement, with some arguing that geography is decisive for political outcomes (geographic determinism). An alternative view is that geographic and political processes mutually influence each other.

OBO GeopoliticsFinally, intellectual discord has originated in the descriptive, prescriptive, and predictive possibilities of geopolitical research. Are experts in the field capable of analyzing the interaction between geography and politics objectively? Is it desirable that these experts are involved in formulating policy advice? And is a geopolitical specialist able to produce reliable forecasts?

All these different perspectives explain why one widely accepted definition of “geopolitics” does not exist.

This article was earlier published as introduction to my Oxford Bibliographies contribution “Geopolitics” and -in a slightly different form- on this website. For more information about geopolitics, please visit ExploringGeopolitics. This website contains contributions of more than 125 experts in Critical, French and Neo-Classical Geopolitics.

Geopolitics

Would you like to share this?

One thought on “Framing 115 Years of Geopolitics in 230 Words

  • 2014 (July) at 12:19
    Permalink

    yes & maybe no … the big divide is between social determinism & ecological determinism with many contested spaces in between. Bioregional is an approach that links peoples to more than territory, rather both a total ecosystem and memory/ phenomenological sense of place, living in place, connectedness over time.

    Social determinism neglects these elements to favour a political economic approach, which stirs emotions as much as the other, but toward an illusion, in part what Benedict Anderson calls ‘imagined community’, in part a disbelief in nature and science. Capitalism could not exist as an ideology without a protestant / monotheistic belief system underlying predestination & manifest destiny.

    In short, a scientific view proposes we are interconnected into a coevolutionary process among communities of species adapting to our changing environments. In this case, Global Climate change that will radically alter & reduce potential human habitat to less than during the great ice age, technological ‘fixes’ aside.

    Politics, so embedded in economics, power & wealth, may more or less acknowledge our perilous condition, but acts in denial of the changes in human social order necessary to survive, more than to merely sustain development.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.